Blogs
Anthony Cheetham
Anthony Cheetham, former c.e.o. of Random Century and Orion, is now chairman of Quercus and The Friday Project.
Future fiction
19.08.07
The recent proposal that public libraries should cease to offer fiction (The Bookseller, 3rd August) is a bit of a shocker. It seems unlikely to succeed, but it is a reminder of how far libraries have already retreated from their role as arbiters of fiction publishing.
Twenty years ago it was libraries that provided the main route to market for new writers. If the package was right, even a début novel could garner orders of a thousand or so hardbacks, and proven veterans could expect sales of up to 10,000. The gatekeepers of the system were the fiction buyers of library suppliers based in Nottingham, Lytham St Annes and Glasgow, obligatory ports of call for sales directors and aspiring editors. The system worked because it was rigorously market-tested by the number of loans recorded for each title. Some of today's most successful fiction imprints—Headline, Century, Little, Brown, Heinemann—based their business models on keen attention to the demands of libraries.
Who are the arbiters now? In theory it is the chain booksellers, but in practice they have relinquished the role to focus on the battle for market share in which readers are force-fed a diet of heavily discounted brand names. In this battle, the winners and losers in the fiction stakes are determined not so much by the discretion of buyers or response of readers as by the collusion of powerful retailers selling shelf-space to the handful of powerful publishers who can afford it—or, more accurately, who cannot afford not to pay for it.
There are signs that this is about to change. The catalyst is the discovery, not before time, that the current system really doesn't work very well. The chains have been losing market share. The independents, after a long decline, are looking at modest gains. I suspect that a number of chain store managers stuck with the three-for-two mentality more because they felt forced to do so by competitive pressures than from personal conviction.
It is highly impropable that the library sector can or should recover its position as a nursery for new fiction. Libraries have been redefined by the arrival of the internet, and assumed a wider range of responsibilities. This column salutes, in passing, the achievement of Tim Coates in his overhaul of Hillingdon's libraries, and hopes it has caught the attention of those who distribute the New Year's honours.
I also hope we can look forward to a brighter future for fiction, where new authors can build a career through the judgement and support of independent or independently minded booksellers.
Comments on this article
By The FU Press
I saw the Trainspotting author saying he thought his debut work would have no chance now - and now all editors are clearly in bed with Tescos and Judy and Richard. But in the end the monolthic world view will disintegrate and the new wave will wash the shelves clear -20 Aug 07 14:43
By Miriam Palfrey
Firstly: the words of one man (with no background in libraries) in one authority does not equate to a general proposal that public libraries should cease to purchase fiction. I would be extremely surprised if you found any librarian workin angywhere in the country agreeing with Mr Ezara's statement. Secondly: "Libraries have been redefined by the arrival of the internet, and assumed a wider range of responsibilities." Perhaps you woudl actually like to research the history of libraries before making a statement like this. Lending fiction, important as it is, has never been the sole purpose of the public library. We provide information. In the past this largely involved reference books and paper-based data but thanks to the development of various electronic media we can offer a much wider range of sources. Our purpose hasn't changed, we just found more ways of fulfilling it. Thirdly: I would advise that you would to wait and see what happens in Hillingdon. I'm not sure that forcing library staff to make coffee (and poor quality coffee at that) is really much of an improvement and no-one seems to be able to answer any questions posed about the changes that are being made. The fact is that Hillingdon was not failing in any way before these changes were posed. By all accounts (including official customer surveys) people were quite satisfied with the services provided. So far no-one has been able to tell me whether the public were even consulted about these changes. The claims made in council press releases seem to be very carefully worded and I think looking at what hasn't been said about the service might tell you a lot more than the boasting about new chairs and coffee.22 Aug 07 08:46
See Also
Anthony Cheetham
- Hope Eternal
Recent Blogs
- A thrilling night for crime writers
- Burning issues
- Super Thursday in pictures
- Who's at the wheel?
- The Jewel of Medina hangs in the balance
Most Active
- Dressed to sell
- Making publishing pay
- A token gesture
- Death of the publisher?
- Making writing pay
Latest Comments
- Kashif Iqbal's responses only emphasise how important it is that we should not allow...
- Actions speak louder than words. Deeds depend upon intentions. About this deed and its...
- My, how you must enjoy feeling indignant! Just don't forget that it's your choice. The...
- If this recession follows the other two I have experienced in the booktrade , books will be...
- kashif, You describe it as soft porn. The author did not write it as such, and most people who...
RSS
Subscriber Content