Blogs
Guilt free reading
04.04.08
In a playful new book, Pierre Bayard, a Parisian professor of French literature, has suggested that our reading is "tyrannised" by our need to be "cultured". We all have worthy books glaring at us at home, the books we ought to read. We feel a weight of unnecessary guilt.
This tyranny frightens people away from bookshops; people like the woman who last week asked nervously for us to recommend a book, as she had never read one. Until we accept that "greatness" in books is arbitrary, and does not imply readability, bookshops will alienate most people.
That quote about "the strange emotional power of cheap music" applies to books too. In 20 years of interviewing for booksellers, one much-loved book stands out: not Proust or old set-text Salinger, but The Magic Faraway Tree by Enid Blyton. Again and again, slightly shamefacedly, people confess that this book touched them like no other. Clinical Ian McEwan and dreary Martin Amis have been memorably described as writing about "buggery among the architect classes". They don't involve people the way Blyton does and Enid will outlast them. Reputation is wayward: most of Hemingway now rarely sells, but Georgette Heyer remains hugely popular.
Amusingly, I detect that truly great writers themselves largely escape Bayard's cultural guilt. Dylan Thomas enjoyed reading westerns. Betjeman was a "Corrie" addict. I have it on good authority that Umberto Eco loves Spiderman comics. A S Byatt is devoted to Discworld novels.
Pratchett and Philip K Dick now merit grudging admiration from the literati, but the rest of sci-fi and fantasy, as well as Blyton, are ignored by them. H G Wells is the sole sci-fi writer in Penguin Classics.
The whole idea of a "classic" is a piece of fogey imperialism that keeps people from reading. This is bizarre, since concepts of "greatness" change over time: Dickens was seen as a "railway read" (i.e. airport read). Henry James dismissed Mrs Gaskell as "mere feminine cleverness", although über-serious Victorian critic Matthew Arnold was spotted blubbing over a Gaskell. Raymond Chandler and Ian Fleming, once garish Pan paperbacks, are now Penguin Classics; The Da Vinci Code will probably join them. Conversely, over half of all Nobel Prize-winners in literature are in the same literary graveyard as Man Booker prize-winners Stanley Middleton and P H Newby.
We should all be as free of classic-angst as "Withnail" writer Bruce Robinson. Asked by a film-student audience for his favourite film, he unhesitatingly recommended "The Little Mermaid".
Comments on this article
By Joe
Brilliantly put, Martin. You're absolutely dead right. As long as this "imperialism", as you label it, continues, bookshops and publishing in general will continue to frighten off and intimidate huge sections of the population. Let's have more accessible and inclusive bookshops! Who decides what is a classic, anyway? Incidentally, have you read John Carey's stimulating and brilliant (I think) 'What Good are the Arts?', chapter two in particular ?04 Apr 08 14:02
By Bel
Fleming and Chandler may fit into genre fiction, but their writing speaks for itself. 'The Da Vinci Code'? Penguin will surely need to re-define the general understanding of the term 'classic' if they are to broaden the church that far - the brand could risk becoming meangingless. I joined a book club recently. Admittedly, everyone there was already an avid reader, but two thirds of the new membership confessed that without a push, which was precisely what they hoped to get from the club, they all too readily stayed in their reading 'comfort zone'. They were seeking a nudge away from familiar bookcovers, away from easy readability, towards a challenge, different material, towards even - dare I say it - the 'classics'. Personally, I'm all for differentiation of reading material, but if the 'difficult' labels are not to be seen as alienating, how about bookshops running more bookclubs?08 Apr 08 12:15
By bobbo
I enjoyed reading this--I tend to define a "classic" as a work of fiction that is not a page-turner. I admit that I enjoy page-turners the most, as well as non-fiction. I was scared away from literature from a high school Lit teacher who was obsessed with grades.10 May 08 04:44
See Also
Martin Latham
- Saving our libraries
- Festival style
- A love letter to books
Most Active
- Dressed to sell
- A token gesture
- Making publishing pay
- Making writing pay
- Death of the publisher?
Latest Comments
- Anthony, I dont remember any rude words contained within your literature. I presume you chose...
- I absolutely agree - the 't' word is one of those, like many others, which may have had a...
- i used it innocently for years as a variant of twit without knowing there was another meaning...
- JW didn't know the meaning of the word? What, a wordsmith of JW's calibre? I doubt that very...
- I've noticed the best way to deal with 'difficult' authors, especially the ones who get abusive...
RSS
Subscriber Content