Blogs
Anthony Horowitz
Anthony Horowitz’s new novel, The Power of Five: Necropolis (Walker Books) is out on 30th October.
Banding together
26.06.08
Until a few weeks ago, I had never even heard of age banding, but now I’m one of more than 2,000 writers, librarians and teachers who have signed the petition against it. The idea of stamping books with an age range was first mooted, with the best intentions, by the Children’s Book Group of the Publishers Association.
I’m not going to repeat all my objections here. Philip Pullman has already set out the case against both elegantly and unarguably, and you can find his views at www.notoagebanding.org. It does annoy me that people I have never even met are trying to impose their views on my work. I also have to ask what makes the CBG so sure that they know best. They now admit that their research was limited, and it has anyway been withdrawn.
For my part, I would like to make two simple observations.
Age banding seems to be aimed at non-specialist outlets such as supermarkets where families who are not familiar with authors and titles may be tempted to make purchases for the first time. The fact that many supermarkets are now stocking children’s books is certainly to be applauded.
But books are not just products. They belong to the authors who wrote them and the children who read them, and that relationship is a very special one. If supermarkets—or non-specialist bookshops, for that matter—really believe that the blurb and the cover design and the critics aren’t enough to age band a book, why can’t they simply add their own label? It will be inexpensive—and it will be their own point of view . . . not part of the book itself. That’s the important point.
And anyway, people don’t buy books because they think they’re the right age, the right size or anything else. They do so on a whim. According to a recent poll in The Bookseller, only 2% of books are bought because booksellers or librarians have recommended them. If ever there was an inexact science, this is it, and pinning the right book to the right kid is about as easy as nailing water to the wall.
In fact, my own Alex Rider books have been purposefully designed to look more adult than they really are. It’s possible, I suppose, that some eight-year-olds may shy away from them, but I think that’s a price worth paying. At the other end of the spectrum, I find them being read by young offenders in prison, some as old as 18. Do we really want to advertise their poor literacy skills? Do we want to make them feel bad about themselves?
But still the Children’s Book Group won’t back down. That’s what really puzzles me. Yes, they’re smart. Yes, they’re influential. But if they don’t listen to children’s authors, I do wonder: why are they there?
Comments on this article
By Antennae
I'm glad to see Anthony Horowitz using the correct word 'stamping' for what is about to happen to a good number of books. The publishers have very disingenuously tried to slide the word 'age guidance' out there to obfuscate the matter. If it were just 'age guidance', it would be what we already have, and this is something entirely different. The books are stamped. Any young reader who picks them up can't miss the age printed on them. And Anthony Horowitz is right. Philip Reeve claims he can see no problem with "stickers" on his own books. Does he not realise that these are not stickers, but as irremovable (and far more noticeable than) the Isbn? And that (whatever he says about films) having '11+' printed on his books will mean that no one over the age of 12 is likely to want to read them? And (to take just one example) that no one who supplies books for young people in one of the Young Offender Institutes that Anthony Horowitz mentions will bother to buy Philip Reeve's books from now on. Why should they? After all, no 14-18 year old young offender will willingly read a book stamped 11+, any more than any poor reader or young dyslexic of 9+ will feel good about triumphantly getting to the end of a book stamped 5+. Those publishers who have a deal more sense than to fall for this shortsighted idea are going to end up having a field day.26 Jun 08 20:46
By Robert McCarty
I totally agree with Mr Horowitz. I have protested categorization of this type in the USA where readers have told us that our Planet Of The Dogs series is enjoyed by readers 6-12 and dog lovers of all ages. Books should not have arbitrary limits of this type forced on them. Robert McCarty30 Jul 08 15:00
By Lookman - Children's Author
Have any of these publishers who support the idea of age banding ever considered the costs to them, it seems not. There is an administration cost between the author and the publisher and there may be a time when the public my object. It is not implausible that a public complaint could lead at some future stage to litigation over a classification. It is also possible as Philip Pulman has said that sales could be curtailed and it might be necessary to to publish several editions of a book under different age ranges. Alternatively, a book could be described as 7+, 8+, 9+ and 10+, that would make banding irrelevant. It reminds me of the policies described on the OMRL parties website.02 Sep 08 05:15
By Sticker fan
Why not insist on age-banding warning being just stickers and not part of the book cover? Perhaps I haven't given this enough thought but it seems like it could appease both sides of the debate and allow less-able readers a chance to avoid stigma.03 Oct 08 09:21
By Sara Evanshield
Mr Horowitz is correct. I am 21 and read his books, I am an adult yet my sister who is ten also enjoys them. His new book Fledgling Jason Steed is a classic. I noticed he wrote it under a pen name somthing to do with Mini Cooper. Regardless the book is amazing. What does the age of a book got to do with it. If a ten year old can enjoy it and as an adult I enjoy them is that all that matters. Anthony Horowitz books, Alex Rider, Jason Steed are written for children. They contain no sex, drugs or heavy violence. Are we American or what ? We are getting soft.05 Nov 08 16:23
See Also
Anthony Horowitz
- Twit for twat
- Political suicide
- Whitewash
Recent Blogs
- A happy medium
- Christmas on a knife edge
- Libraries are moving forwards
- Clarke ‘rude’ to Motion
- Speak up for libraries
Most Active
- Dressed to sell
- Making publishing pay
- A token gesture
- Making writing pay
- Death of the publisher?
Latest Comments
- We've all had a meeting at the MLA and we've decided that we are doing a really good job...
- I'm agreed with you that publishers need to look at their sales strategy holistically and how...
- There is a new proposal to axe 14 libraries in the Wirral. I subscribe to MLA press releases -...
- As for The White Tiger, the Bookseller neglected to mention that at the time of going to press,...
- The 'dubious statistics' to which Roy Clare refers above are those published by CIPFA for the...
RSS
Subscriber Content