News
Authors question age-ranging statistics
02.10.08 Benedicte Page
Former children’s laureate Anne Fine has said she is “mystified” by the Publishers Association claim that between 75% and 95% of new and reprinted children’s titles will include age guidance by the new year.
Writing on theBookseller.com, Fine said: “Over 800 authors and illustrators have now signed up to www.notoagebanding.org—many of them huge sellers—and in recent weeks not one of them has met with any significant resistance from their publishers when they have insisted they want no banding, or the banding removed on reprints and not printed on any future books.” She queried: “Whose books are these exactly?”
A spokeswoman for the PA said: “The figures came from a meeting with publishers at the Children’s Book Group, who all said that they would have between 75% and 95% of new titles published with age guidance between now and spring 2009.”
Celia Rees, chair of the Society of Authors’ Children’s Writers and Illustrators Group, has also questioned the PA’s figures, saying the number was “exactly” the same as the one given in the summer. But the PA spokeswoman said that the estimated figure put out in the summer had now been “confirmed”.
It is understood that publishers have a high number of commissioned titles—books written to order as part of a series—where age guidance can be included without the need to check with authors.
Terry Pratchett, Alan Garner, Darren Shan and Philip Pullman are among the big names supporting the authors’ revolt against plans to introduce age guidance on children’s books.
The PA Children’s Book Group is currently in the process of deciding how best to evaluate the effects of the inclusion of age guidance on book covers this autumn.
Comments on this article
By Alan Garner
There may be a case for age banding unchallenging books commissioned as a part of a series, where writers are working to order and not out of their own compulsions; but that statistic should not be used to make an argument for including those that are driven from within to try to say something urgent. Mr. Man has a finite audience. Tom, in his Midnight Garden, does not. Both are books, yet it would be cynically devious to the point of moral abuse if the PA were to impose its will by refusing to differentiate.02 Oct 08 09:51
See Also
Related
- Horror the new fantasy at Bologna
- Winstone: picture books need marketing spend
- Conville and Walsh launches children's arm
- Publishers push on with age guidance
- Film deals line up post Bologna
Book news from the BBC
- Mother rejects child abuse memoir
- Male writers dominate Costa award
- Mother denies judge's abuse claim
- Author Ness wins Booktrust prize
- Noddy returning for 60th birthday
Latest Comments
- Did you know that Dawn French's memoir, Dear Fatty (Century),...
- I can't see you (or Sparkfilms) on the Internet Movie Database (imdb.com)....
- So what is the real value of Woolworths? I would say that after the key...
- The retail dam is likely to burst open at any moment. I see some major...
- More quasi-religious censorship. Will it never end?
RSS
Subscriber Content